Quiet Quitting Wasn’t an Employee Problem...It Was a Leadership Choice
- Erika Chestnut

- Jun 11
- 3 min read

TL;DR: Your earnings aren’t shrinking because your team is lazy or your “under-performers” are dragging the high achievers down. They’re shrinking because fear and status games have replaced trust and candor. Quiet quitting isn't employee apathy, it's leadership suppression. The good news? You created the problem, which means you can also solve it.
The performance myth that keeps costing you
When leaders doubled down on “high performance culture” instead of fixing the culture debt that caused quiet quitting, they missed the point.
You don’t get innovation, creativity, or profit from compliance, you get them from psychological safety, ownership, and healthy dissent.
Fear-based environments silence truth, delay feedback, and destroy the speed you need to compete. Teams don’t disengage because they’re lazy; they disengage because it’s not safe to care.
As Amy Edmondson showed in The Fearless Organization, fear “robs the mind of its powers of acting and reasoning,” while psychological safety enables risk-taking, learning, and high performance.
Fear is expensive
Every quarter you avoid addressing culture debt, you pay an invisible tax:
Slower decisions when teams spend more time managing status than solving problems
Risk aversion where innovation dies when “mistakes” are punished instead of studied
Talent drain, because the best people won’t stay in systems that punish candor and protect mediocrity.
Leadership: the problem and the solution
You can’t fix performance with slogans or pressure. You fix it by changing the system that drives behavior.
Make it safe to speak up and expect it. Leaders who model “I might be wrong” and ask “What are we not seeing?” create the conditions for innovation.
Institutionalize dissent. Lencioni’s Overcoming the Five Dysfunctions of a Team makes it clear: healthy conflict and debate are prerequisites for trust and commitment.
Normalize failure. Fearless cultures treat “failed experiments” as data. Without this, you’ll never scale learning or velocity.
Build clarity and accountability. Rumelt’s Good Strategy/Bad Strategy teaches that good strategy is about diagnosing the real obstacle and focusing action there, not spreading effort thin across 20 goals.
Coach, don’t manage. Replace “check-ins” with real 1:1 coaching.
Asking leading and coaching questions like:
“What’s getting in your way?” “What did you learn this week?” “What would make this easier to do better next time?”
A quick audit for every executive
Ask yourself (and answer honestly):
When was the last time you publicly changed your mind because someone junior pushed back?
Do your teams get rewarded for surfacing risk early...or for saving face late?
Are you tracking culture as a leading indicator of performance, or just reading engagement scores after the damage is done?
What high performance actually looks like
High performance isn’t pressure; it’s clarity plus safety plus ownership.
It’s the system that lets people:
Speak up without fear
Challenge leadership without consequence
Experiment without punishment
Collaborate across silos without ego
That’s the foundation of innovation and profit, not perks or posters.
People didn’t stop caring. They stopped feeling safe to care.
When leaders build cultures that reward curiosity, dissent, and truth, those same “quiet quitters” become quiet innovators.
They start solving problems again because they trust they won’t get burned for it.
Related Reading
The Culture Code — Daniel Coyle
The Fearless Organization — Amy Edmondson
Overcoming the Five Dysfunctions of a Team — Patrick Lencioni
Good Strategy / Bad Strategy — Richard Rumelt
Work Rules! — Laszlo Bock




Comments